Ground screws vs concrete
A fair comparison, based on real data. On 9 criteria out of 10, the screw foundation comes out ahead. But it is not the right choice for every situation, and we say so clearly.
If you are starting from scratch, first read what ground screws are and how they work.
−50/85%
Lower CO₂ emissions
−30/50%
Foundation cost
Hours
of installation, not weeks
Removable
leaves no trace
Ground screw or concrete footing: the comparison point by point
| Criterion | Screw foundation | Concrete footing |
|---|---|---|
| Installation time | ✓ A few hours (for example a 4x4 m deck) | 3-5 days + up to 28 days of curing |
| Total cost | ✓ Generally lower (−30% / −50%) | Excavation + reinforcement + concrete + labour |
| Environmental impact (CO₂) | ✓ 50% to 85% less than concrete | ~0.9 kg CO₂ per kg of cement produced |
| Removability | ✓ Yes: unscrewed and taken away, it leaves no trace | No: demolition needed |
| Building permits | ✓ Removable works: often a simpler procedure* | Permanent works: often needs planning permission |
| Weather dependence | ✓ None: installed all year round | High: not below 5°C, not in rain |
| Ground disturbance | ✓ Minimal: no excavation | Extensive: excavation and spoil disposal |
| Reusability | ✓ Yes: several cycles of use | Never: it becomes waste |
| Service life | Hot-dip galvanized to ISO 1461: depends on the zinc thickness and on how aggressive the soil is; for aggressive soils stainless steel is considered | Depends on design, exposure and maintenance |
| Extreme loads (>100 kN) | Requires special design | ✓ Footing sized for the job |
* How the works are classified for planning purposes depends on the project, on the structure above and on local regulations: always check with your local authority or with the engineer in charge.
Environmental impact: the figures
CO₂ emissions compared
Producing cement generates about 0.9 kg of CO₂ per kg of product. Galvanized steel has a much lower carbon footprint; the difference depends on the size of the footing it replaces.
Estimated reduction: 50% to 85% less CO₂
−50/85%
less CO₂
Every screw foundation installed instead of a concrete footing is a real contribution to cutting emissions.
When concrete is still the better choice
We believe in being straightforward. These are the cases where a conventional foundation may be more suitable:
Solid rock
If the ground is mostly solid rock, screwing in may be difficult or impossible without pre-drilling.
Extreme loads (>100 kN per point)
For very heavy structures (multi-storey buildings, bridges), reinforced concrete footings can be sized for higher loads.
Waterproofed foundations
If you need a waterproofed basement, a reinforced concrete foundation is the only option.
Specific regulatory requirements
Some local building regulations may specifically require concrete foundations for certain types of structure.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, a ground screw or a concrete footing?
How much do ground screws cost compared with concrete?
How much CO₂ does a ground screw save?
Can ground screws be installed in winter or in the rain?
Do you need a permit for a ground screw foundation?
More answers on service life, soils and permits in the FAQ.
Compare for your project
Use our configurator to estimate the ground screws you need and the CO₂ you save.
Configure online